Threadwatch has keenly pointed out that it looks like Google is now sending out “You’re Banned for 30 Days” notices to sites that are deemed to have certain levels of quality content, but that violate aspects of Google’s guidelines. Via Search Engine Forums
Example slightly edited of specific names:
From: Google Search Quality DO NOT REPLY
Date: 8 September 2005 23:10:04 BDT
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Removal from Google’s Index
Dear site owner or webmaster of [url removed],
While we were indexing your webpages, we detected that some of your pages were using techniques that were outside our quality guidelines, which can be found here: [link] In order to preserve the quality of our search engine, we have temporarily removed some webpages from our search results. Currently pages from [url removed] are scheduled to be removed for at least 30 days.
Specifically, we detected the following practices on your webpages:
On [url removed], we noticed that pages such as [url removed] redirect to pages such as [url removed] using JavaScript redirects.
We would prefer to have your pages in Google’s index. If you wish to be reincluded, please correct or remove all pages that are outside our quality guidelines. When you are ready, please submit a reinclusion request at [link]
You can select “I’m a webmaster inquiring about my website” and then “Why my site disappeared from the search results or dropped in ranking,” click Continue, and then make sure to type “Reinclusion Request” in the Subject: line of the resulting form.
Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team
And a post from Matt Cutts of Google on Threadwatch:
“Google is trying out a pilot program to alert site owners when we’re removing their site for violating our guidelines. JavaScript redirects are the first trial, but we’ve also sent a few emails about hidden text, I believe. This is not targeted to sites like buy-my-cheap-viagra-here.com, but more for sites that have good content, but may not be as savvy about what their SEO was doing or what that “Make thousands of doorway pages for $39.95″ software was doing. Personally, I think opening up a line of communication to let webmasters know when we’re taking action is a really good thing–a site owner doesn’t have to guess about what happened. But again, we’re starting with a trial program.”
We all know Google likes to solve things “algorithmically” so how many “good” sites will get caught in this filter? At the same time, it’s promising that Google is now making an attempt to notify sites of any search spam screw ups. But notifying the web host in the CC? Is that necessary? Am curious what others think about this?
