<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be Geek Cool and Lose the WWW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/</link>
	<description>Grow your business with TopRank Online Marketing tips, articles, &#38; expert information on social media, content marketing &#38; search engine marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Stansberry</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26713</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Stansberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26713</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Lee!  Yeah, I really only left out the www because I think it kind of clutters a domain.  It&#039;s not realy needed (yay .htaccess!), and I think that people might remember it a little better if there&#039;s not a www in front to muck things up.  So, minimalism and marketing were my two factors :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Lee!  Yeah, I really only left out the www because I think it kind of clutters a domain.  It&#8217;s not realy needed (yay .htaccess!), and I think that people might remember it a little better if there&#8217;s not a www in front to muck things up.  So, minimalism and marketing were my two factors <img src='http://www.toprankblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acorn Creative</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26694</link>
		<dc:creator>Acorn Creative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26694</guid>
		<description>[...] Let&#8217;s start a list:* Are you smiling when you answer the phone?* If you say you&#8217;ll call back in 2 hours, which happens more often &#8230; a 90 minute callback or a 3 hour callback?* Do you use &#8220;www&#8221; in your URL like everbody else or are you &#8220;geek cool&#8220;?* Did you actually put thought into the difference between the fonts that you use in headlines vs. body text?* Do you reinforce your own brand by giving your employees computer wallpaper?* etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let&#8217;s start a list:* Are you smiling when you answer the phone?* If you say you&#8217;ll call back in 2 hours, which happens more often &#8230; a 90 minute callback or a 3 hour callback?* Do you use &#8220;www&#8221; in your URL like everbody else or are you &#8220;geek cool&#8220;?* Did you actually put thought into the difference between the fonts that you use in headlines vs. body text?* Do you reinforce your own brand by giving your employees computer wallpaper?* etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26692</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26692</guid>
		<description>I suppose if more sites started using the non-www it would make anything using a sub-domain stand out. But I doubt that will happen any time soon. There&#039;s too much brand investment in the www version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose if more sites started using the non-www it would make anything using a sub-domain stand out. But I doubt that will happen any time soon. There&#8217;s too much brand investment in the www version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26610</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/be-geek-cool-and-lose-the-www/#comment-26610</guid>
		<description>I used to do this back in 1998 to be cool.  At that point a lot of people just couldn&#039;t imagine how you could pull such a thing off on the www without the www.

Now days I&#039;ve stuck with www. Simply because Google used to not understand that with or with out &quot;www&quot; was actually the same place.  The key is to be consistent, but you can&#039;t control how people link.

Apparently now this problem is fixed, so everyone can (maybe) stop using those .htaccess redirects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to do this back in 1998 to be cool.  At that point a lot of people just couldn&#8217;t imagine how you could pull such a thing off on the www without the www.</p>
<p>Now days I&#8217;ve stuck with www. Simply because Google used to not understand that with or with out &#8220;www&#8221; was actually the same place.  The key is to be consistent, but you can&#8217;t control how people link.</p>
<p>Apparently now this problem is fixed, so everyone can (maybe) stop using those .htaccess redirects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

