<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Opens Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/facebook-opens-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/facebook-opens-up/</link>
	<description>Grow your business with TopRank Online Marketing tips, articles, &#38; expert information on social media, content marketing &#38; search engine marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/facebook-opens-up/#comment-27697</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/facebook-opens-up/#comment-27697</guid>
		<description>Thanks sebastians. One point Mark Zuckerberg made in his interview with Bambi Francisco was that Facebook was a collection of networks, not one big network and that you would only have access to those in the network you select for your self: university, regional or work. However, after spending a bit of time on the service, I&#039;m not 100% sure that&#039;s the case.

I would expect the deal with Microsoft probably motivated the &quot;opening up&quot; of Facebook to some degree. More users = more advertising reach. On the surface, that&#039;s not good for users, but it depends how Facebook handles it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks sebastians. One point Mark Zuckerberg made in his interview with Bambi Francisco was that Facebook was a collection of networks, not one big network and that you would only have access to those in the network you select for your self: university, regional or work. However, after spending a bit of time on the service, I&#8217;m not 100% sure that&#8217;s the case.</p>
<p>I would expect the deal with Microsoft probably motivated the &#8220;opening up&#8221; of Facebook to some degree. More users = more advertising reach. On the surface, that&#8217;s not good for users, but it depends how Facebook handles it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebastians</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/facebook-opens-up/#comment-27690</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/09/facebook-opens-up/#comment-27690</guid>
		<description>lee, welcome to facebook then. but don&#039;t you think they destroy their usp with opening themselves to the masses? that was actually what i enjoyed most to myspace, that it was a kind of a smaller thing. and no, i do not approve of the changes facebook did to us, they are 1984&#039;ish and make you start to stalk people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lee, welcome to facebook then. but don&#8217;t you think they destroy their usp with opening themselves to the masses? that was actually what i enjoyed most to myspace, that it was a kind of a smaller thing. and no, i do not approve of the changes facebook did to us, they are 1984&#8242;ish and make you start to stalk people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

