<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: digg Spam Policy Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/</link>
	<description>Grow your business with TopRank Online Marketing tips, articles, &#38; expert information on social media, content marketing &#38; search engine marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOPittfall &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg Gets Dugg - Search Engine Optimization by pittfall!</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-138536</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOPittfall &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg Gets Dugg - Search Engine Optimization by pittfall!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-138536</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg Gets Dugg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg Gets Dugg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do&#8217;s and Don&#8217;ts of Spamming Social Media &#187; Online Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-53666</link>
		<dc:creator>Do&#8217;s and Don&#8217;ts of Spamming Social Media &#187; Online Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-53666</guid>
		<description>[...] And yet the effort was made within the digg community to disallow any stories from Online Marketing Blog from being submitted to digg with no chance of a human evaluation of the situation or process of reinclusion. digg has taken a DMOZ style persona in handling such matters with the puzzling part being domain names can be banned as a result of actions that have nothing to do with the owner of the web site. At least Google and Yahoo are mature enough to have a review and reinclusion processes in place [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And yet the effort was made within the digg community to disallow any stories from Online Marketing Blog from being submitted to digg with no chance of a human evaluation of the situation or process of reinclusion. digg has taken a DMOZ style persona in handling such matters with the puzzling part being domain names can be banned as a result of actions that have nothing to do with the owner of the web site. At least Google and Yahoo are mature enough to have a review and reinclusion processes in place [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democracy Hath No Bury Button &#124; Am I Famous Now&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-53361</link>
		<dc:creator>Democracy Hath No Bury Button &#124; Am I Famous Now&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-53361</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more about Digg&#8217;s spam and blacklisting policy here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more about Digg&#8217;s spam and blacklisting policy here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Mooney</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-52989</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Mooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-52989</guid>
		<description>Here is the story of the &quot;catalyst&quot; that got me banned from Digg:

http://paulamooney.blogspot.com/2006/12/all-diggnations-men.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the story of the &#8220;catalyst&#8221; that got me banned from Digg:</p>
<p><a href="http://paulamooney.blogspot.com/2006/12/all-diggnations-men.html" rel="nofollow">http://paulamooney.blogspot.com/2006/12/all-diggnations-men.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Of All Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web Sweeties Found In My Feed Reader 2</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-52876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Of All Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web Sweeties Found In My Feed Reader 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-52876</guid>
		<description>[...] digg Spam Policy Roundup A nice roundup of digg Spam blog entries. Expect to see many more of those in the next months and to read about digg all over blogland until you can see or hear the name anymore. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] digg Spam Policy Roundup A nice roundup of digg Spam blog entries. Expect to see many more of those in the next months and to read about digg all over blogland until you can see or hear the name anymore. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51453</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51453</guid>
		<description>What surprises me about the whole Digg vs SEO issue is the blanket dislike. In one sense SEO&#039;s are simply webmasters with a greater awareness of marketing possibilities online (crude, I know). But the actions of a few &quot;seo spammers&quot; shouldn&#039;t blacklist SEO as a practice anymore than email spam should mean people reject using email.

2c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What surprises me about the whole Digg vs SEO issue is the blanket dislike. In one sense SEO&#8217;s are simply webmasters with a greater awareness of marketing possibilities online (crude, I know). But the actions of a few &#8220;seo spammers&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t blacklist SEO as a practice anymore than email spam should mean people reject using email.</p>
<p>2c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Kondrat</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51413</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Kondrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51413</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee,

Thanks for noticing my post and I am glad you are receiving so much support.  I still don&#039;t get how a sight like Digg can support such a tactic.  It goes against everything they stand for at least from the perspective of a reader.

Also you should know your stuff is being ripped off by SEOCOIN.com unless thats an affiliated site you may want to chat with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>Thanks for noticing my post and I am glad you are receiving so much support.  I still don&#8217;t get how a sight like Digg can support such a tactic.  It goes against everything they stand for at least from the perspective of a reader.</p>
<p>Also you should know your stuff is being ripped off by SEOCOIN.com unless thats an affiliated site you may want to chat with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Practical Blogging &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-23</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51331</link>
		<dc:creator>Practical Blogging &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51331</guid>
		<description>[...] digg Spam Policy Roundup (tags: digg ban spam dugg) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] digg Spam Policy Roundup (tags: digg ban spam dugg) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51247</guid>
		<description>Pete -- often times its nothing that a URL does that gets it banned; quite often it is probably small cadre sof diggers who have a pre-existing prejudices against different things.  People who don&#039;t like blogs.  People who don&#039;t like SEO.  People who find &quot;web2.0&quot; design &quot;annoying&quot;.  People who don&#039;t like marketers.

If you&#039;re looking for a way to make sure a URL isn&#039;t banned, the only absolute way is to make sure its never submitted to Digg.  I think as long as the banning and &quot;spamming&quot; process works the way it does, there will always be a risk that you will be offending someone even if your intentions are pure.

That is to say, even if your blog is about potatoes, and say, you did a post about &quot;top 10 awesome things to do with Potatoes AFTER Xmas&quot;, you might get buried NOT because people hate potatoes (who hates potatoes?), but because people don&#039;t like blogs, they might view your submission as &quot;spam&quot;, or overly commercial etc etc.

Cheers
t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete &#8212; often times its nothing that a URL does that gets it banned; quite often it is probably small cadre sof diggers who have a pre-existing prejudices against different things.  People who don&#8217;t like blogs.  People who don&#8217;t like SEO.  People who find &#8220;web2.0&#8243; design &#8220;annoying&#8221;.  People who don&#8217;t like marketers.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for a way to make sure a URL isn&#8217;t banned, the only absolute way is to make sure its never submitted to Digg.  I think as long as the banning and &#8220;spamming&#8221; process works the way it does, there will always be a risk that you will be offending someone even if your intentions are pure.</p>
<p>That is to say, even if your blog is about potatoes, and say, you did a post about &#8220;top 10 awesome things to do with Potatoes AFTER Xmas&#8221;, you might get buried NOT because people hate potatoes (who hates potatoes?), but because people don&#8217;t like blogs, they might view your submission as &#8220;spam&#8221;, or overly commercial etc etc.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51210</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51210</guid>
		<description>Yeah, not used a digg button on our blog to make it easy for &quot;SEO&quot; flavored stories to be submitted. digg users hate SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, not used a digg button on our blog to make it easy for &#8220;SEO&#8221; flavored stories to be submitted. digg users hate SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Prestipino</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51207</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Prestipino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/digg-spam-policy-roundup/#comment-51207</guid>
		<description>I was shocked to hear about toprankblog&#039;s banning. Is there anything specific that if you look back on you would have done differently in terms of your interaction with digg? I&#039;m  curious about the catalyst for banning so it can be avoided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked to hear about toprankblog&#8217;s banning. Is there anything specific that if you look back on you would have done differently in terms of your interaction with digg? I&#8217;m  curious about the catalyst for banning so it can be avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

