<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SES Chicago SEO Videos &#8211; Stacy Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/</link>
	<description>Grow your business with TopRank Online Marketing tips, articles, &#38; expert information on social media, content marketing &#38; search engine marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-88367</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-88367</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stacy. I use this in my Search 101 training. It is insightful!

Molly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stacy. I use this in my Search 101 training. It is insightful!</p>
<p>Molly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeb</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48302</guid>
		<description>That was totally class of her not to use this for self promotion, and it was totally class of him to give her a little free promo at the end -- she totally deserved it. Thanks for the sharing the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was totally class of her not to use this for self promotion, and it was totally class of him to give her a little free promo at the end &#8212; she totally deserved it. Thanks for the sharing the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and Yahoo Meddle with Search Ad Campaigns &#187; The Online Industrialist</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48297</link>
		<dc:creator>Google and Yahoo Meddle with Search Ad Campaigns &#187; The Online Industrialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48297</guid>
		<description>[...] While doing my usual daily perusal of digg, I found a useful video of Stacy Williams describing some liberties that Google and Yahoo may take with your search engine ad campaigns. This short video (just under 4 minutes) was filmed at the Search Engine Strategies (SES) conference in Chicago, and in it Stacy touches on the following three points: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While doing my usual daily perusal of digg, I found a useful video of Stacy Williams describing some liberties that Google and Yahoo may take with your search engine ad campaigns. This short video (just under 4 minutes) was filmed at the Search Engine Strategies (SES) conference in Chicago, and in it Stacy touches on the following three points: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger W.</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48294</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48294</guid>
		<description>Good interview with Stacy.  I&#039;m not sure about her specific examples but so far I&#039;ve never had Google or Yahoo! make changes to accounts I&#039;ve worked on without letting us know what&#039;s happening and/or asking for review/approval first.  It might be an issue with making sure those expectations are set with your rep.

Stacy made a good suggestion with looking at your traffic logs to figure out what the search term was which drove users to your site in order to find a list of good negatives.  Another way would be to tailor your copy to make sure users wouldn&#039;t be confused.  I would imagine in the case of the &quot;used sun&quot; the ad should have mentioned Sun servers to avoid people thinking it was used Sunfires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good interview with Stacy.  I&#8217;m not sure about her specific examples but so far I&#8217;ve never had Google or Yahoo! make changes to accounts I&#8217;ve worked on without letting us know what&#8217;s happening and/or asking for review/approval first.  It might be an issue with making sure those expectations are set with your rep.</p>
<p>Stacy made a good suggestion with looking at your traffic logs to figure out what the search term was which drove users to your site in order to find a list of good negatives.  Another way would be to tailor your copy to make sure users wouldn&#8217;t be confused.  I would imagine in the case of the &#8220;used sun&#8221; the ad should have mentioned Sun servers to avoid people thinking it was used Sunfires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; &#187; Yahoo &#38; Google passen (ongevraagd) advertentie campagnes aan ? &#124; Percept</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48254</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; &#187; Yahoo &#38; Google passen (ongevraagd) advertentie campagnes aan ? &#124; Percept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-48254</guid>
		<description>[...] via Toprankingblog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Toprankingblog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-47445</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 21:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-47445</guid>
		<description>Great explanation and examples Richard and thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation and examples Richard and thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-47436</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-47436</guid>
		<description>Lee - Nice interviews.  Good to hear Stacy mention expanded matching.  I&#039;ve been advising setting different bids for exact, phrase and broad, particularly as broad is now actually expanded broad matching.  For instance, in the video she gives the example of buying ads for /used sun/ broad match.  That could look like this in an ad group keyword list:

[used sun] ** 1.44
&quot;used sun&quot; ** 0.99
used sun ** 0.25

Point is to pay more for what you know you&#039;re buying and less for what you don&#039;t know.  Also, if you are buying broad matches, it&#039;s worth using Google&#039;s keyword tool with the &quot;Use synonyms&quot; box checked to get an idea ahead of time as to how the system might expand the broad match.  In the case of /used sun/ I&#039;m currently seeing expanded keywords like:

used cars for sale
used sunfire

Clearly, Google&#039;s keyword system is expanding &quot;sun&quot; to &quot;sunfire&quot; and then equating that with &quot;cars&quot; so if I had keywords /used sun/ broad match, I&#039;d definitely add these negatives right from the start:

-car
-cars
-sunfire

It is useful to use (expanded) broad match, but it&#039;s worth minimizing risk by setting those bids much lower than exact or phrase, so you&#039;re not paying for clicks for poorly matched keywords.  As Stacy mentions in the video, it&#039;s important to scour the server logs periodically to see what actual keywords the broad matches are bringing.  Then, new negatives and even new exact and phrase matches can be added to the ad group.  This way, the keyword list can evolve over time but you&#039;re not paying high CPCs for extraneous keywords along the way.

Anyway, haven&#039;t seen too many people dig into expanded matching so figured it&#039;d be worth mentioning how important it is to recognize that it is the default way Google handles keywords and advertisers need to deal with it appropriately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee &#8211; Nice interviews.  Good to hear Stacy mention expanded matching.  I&#8217;ve been advising setting different bids for exact, phrase and broad, particularly as broad is now actually expanded broad matching.  For instance, in the video she gives the example of buying ads for /used sun/ broad match.  That could look like this in an ad group keyword list:</p>
<p>[used sun] ** 1.44<br />
&#8220;used sun&#8221; ** 0.99<br />
used sun ** 0.25</p>
<p>Point is to pay more for what you know you&#8217;re buying and less for what you don&#8217;t know.  Also, if you are buying broad matches, it&#8217;s worth using Google&#8217;s keyword tool with the &#8220;Use synonyms&#8221; box checked to get an idea ahead of time as to how the system might expand the broad match.  In the case of /used sun/ I&#8217;m currently seeing expanded keywords like:</p>
<p>used cars for sale<br />
used sunfire</p>
<p>Clearly, Google&#8217;s keyword system is expanding &#8220;sun&#8221; to &#8220;sunfire&#8221; and then equating that with &#8220;cars&#8221; so if I had keywords /used sun/ broad match, I&#8217;d definitely add these negatives right from the start:</p>
<p>-car<br />
-cars<br />
-sunfire</p>
<p>It is useful to use (expanded) broad match, but it&#8217;s worth minimizing risk by setting those bids much lower than exact or phrase, so you&#8217;re not paying for clicks for poorly matched keywords.  As Stacy mentions in the video, it&#8217;s important to scour the server logs periodically to see what actual keywords the broad matches are bringing.  Then, new negatives and even new exact and phrase matches can be added to the ad group.  This way, the keyword list can evolve over time but you&#8217;re not paying high CPCs for extraneous keywords along the way.</p>
<p>Anyway, haven&#8217;t seen too many people dig into expanded matching so figured it&#8217;d be worth mentioning how important it is to recognize that it is the default way Google handles keywords and advertisers need to deal with it appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TopRank SES Chicago Wrap Up &#187; Online Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-47382</link>
		<dc:creator>TopRank SES Chicago Wrap Up &#187; Online Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-seo-videos-stacy-williams/#comment-47382</guid>
		<description>[...] Gord Hotchkiss Stephan Spencer Joshua Stylman &amp; Peter Hershberg Neil Patel &amp; Cameron Olthius Bruce Clay Laura Thieme Stacy Williams [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gord Hotchkiss Stephan Spencer Joshua Stylman &#38; Peter Hershberg Neil Patel &#38; Cameron Olthius Bruce Clay Laura Thieme Stacy Williams [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

