<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Categories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/</link>
	<description>Grow your business with TopRank Online Marketing tips, articles, &#38; expert information on social media, content marketing &#38; search engine marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#62;&#62; Search Perspective &#62;&#62; Discussions Surrounding Search &#124; TMP Directional Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google tests new SERP format</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-163688</link>
		<dc:creator>&#62;&#62; Search Perspective &#62;&#62; Discussions Surrounding Search &#124; TMP Directional Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google tests new SERP format</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-163688</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently, while performing a fairly routine search on Google, something caught my eye.  My results were being fragmented into what are being called &#8220;Google categories.&#8221;  As other blogs have pointed out, these results are prompted by broad keyterms like DVD players and lawn care.  Our example shows these results are also prompted by a product model number.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, while performing a fairly routine search on Google, something caught my eye.  My results were being fragmented into what are being called &#8220;Google categories.&#8221;  As other blogs have pointed out, these results are prompted by broad keyterms like DVD players and lawn care.  Our example shows these results are also prompted by a product model number.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Search Engine Rankings are Dead? &#187; Online Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-124608</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Search Engine Rankings are Dead? &#187; Online Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-124608</guid>
		<description>[...] With the advent of personalization and impending changes with the interface of search results, the notion of ranking seems to be on it&#8217;s way out. In the past 3-4 years, most SEO consulting firms have been focusing on traffic and especially the past 2-3 years on conversions. Standard search engine rankings as a proxy to sales will become irrelevant, especially as other channels of search have emerged in popularity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With the advent of personalization and impending changes with the interface of search results, the notion of ranking seems to be on it&#8217;s way out. In the past 3-4 years, most SEO consulting firms have been focusing on traffic and especially the past 2-3 years on conversions. Standard search engine rankings as a proxy to sales will become irrelevant, especially as other channels of search have emerged in popularity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-116538</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-116538</guid>
		<description>Lee Odden, you make a couple good points; we&#039;re always trying new approaches and different UIs. In a way-early test, I wouldn&#039;t worry that much about which category a particular site was in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Odden, you make a couple good points; we&#8217;re always trying new approaches and different UIs. In a way-early test, I wouldn&#8217;t worry that much about which category a particular site was in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shriram</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115580</link>
		<dc:creator>Shriram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115580</guid>
		<description>Submit the site to the appropriate category at dmoz.org and cross your fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Submit the site to the appropriate category at dmoz.org and cross your fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Categories - if released - could become a threat for comparison engines / shopping engines</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115353</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Categories - if released - could become a threat for comparison engines / shopping engines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115353</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Categories, published April 18th. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Categories, published April 18th. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Leonhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115304</link>
		<dc:creator>David Leonhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115304</guid>
		<description>Actually, for years Google has been displaying a group of spoon bending results in the middle of its SERP for &quot;metal bending&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, for years Google has been displaying a group of spoon bending results in the middle of its SERP for &#8220;metal bending&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Seibert</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115269</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Seibert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-115269</guid>
		<description>Lee,

Thanks for showing the screenshots and giving us this update.  Do you have any idea how Google&#039;s deciding the category order?  Would love any more light you can shed.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee,</p>
<p>Thanks for showing the screenshots and giving us this update.  Do you have any idea how Google&#8217;s deciding the category order?  Would love any more light you can shed.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net NoBlog di Raffaele Coruzzi &#187; Nuove SERP per Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-114884</link>
		<dc:creator>Net NoBlog di Raffaele Coruzzi &#187; Nuove SERP per Google?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-114884</guid>
		<description>[...] Leggo da queste parti, che Google sta testando nuove SERP, che per ora hanno visto in pochi. Ma se ne parla già in rete, e potrebbe essere una delle maggiori novità per il search engine marketing dei prossimi mesi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leggo da queste parti, che Google sta testando nuove SERP, che per ora hanno visto in pochi. Ma se ne parla già in rete, e potrebbe essere una delle maggiori novità per il search engine marketing dei prossimi mesi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le serp di Google raggruppate per categorie</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113940</link>
		<dc:creator>Le serp di Google raggruppate per categorie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113940</guid>
		<description>[...] Leggendo Seroundtable&#160;ed alcuni&#160;altri, scopro che nei risultati di Google appare una classificazione dei risultati per categorie che non siamo abituati a vedere (ho provato a riprodurre l’effetto, ma le serp sono tornate normali): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leggendo Seroundtable&nbsp;ed alcuni&nbsp;altri, scopro che nei risultati di Google appare una classificazione dei risultati per categorie che non siamo abituati a vedere (ho provato a riprodurre l’effetto, ma le serp sono tornate normali): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Categories - Changes to Competitive SEO &#124; SoloSEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113337</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Categories - Changes to Competitive SEO &#124; SoloSEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113337</guid>
		<description>[...] Lee Odden blogged about Google Categories yesterday. I wasn&#8217;t able to duplicate the categories look, but it did get me thinking about the ramifications of competition if categories in search become commonplace, and how it might influence our SEO strategies as business owners. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lee Odden blogged about Google Categories yesterday. I wasn&#8217;t able to duplicate the categories look, but it did get me thinking about the ramifications of competition if categories in search become commonplace, and how it might influence our SEO strategies as business owners. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113211</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113211</guid>
		<description>I deleted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I deleted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113195</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113195</guid>
		<description>Spam much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113167</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113167</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave, I&#039;m not sure how they&#039;re figuring out those categories but the search operators were even worse. This must be an pre-pre-pre-alpha sort of test. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave, I&#8217;m not sure how they&#8217;re figuring out those categories but the search operators were even worse. This must be an pre-pre-pre-alpha sort of test. <img src='http://www.toprankblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113145</guid>
		<description>Humm, tv-style on the net.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm, tv-style on the net&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveN</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113078</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113078</guid>
		<description>Lee is it just me but have they messed up again : 

videohelp isn&#039;t really a comparison site, but it does compare DVD&#039;s via reviews and links to pricegrabber.

shopping.com is a comparison site not a store !!

DaveN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee is it just me but have they messed up again : </p>
<p>videohelp isn&#8217;t really a comparison site, but it does compare DVD&#8217;s via reviews and links to pricegrabber.</p>
<p>shopping.com is a comparison site not a store !!</p>
<p>DaveN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113062</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-113062</guid>
		<description>I work with many &quot;information based&quot; clients so it&#039;ll be interesting to see how they categorise those sorts of sites.

Also, it&#039;ll be interesting to see if there&#039;s anything the webmaster could do to get their categorisation changed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with many &#8220;information based&#8221; clients so it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how they categorise those sorts of sites.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;ll be interesting to see if there&#8217;s anything the webmaster could do to get their categorisation changed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlstotts</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112975</link>
		<dc:creator>mlstotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112975</guid>
		<description>If you like what Google is testing with categorized search for products you should visit Retrevo.com. Retrevo launched in September with vertical search for consumer electronics - if you have to research, buy or fix any gadget Retrevo cuts through the noise and clutter pretty well. - m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like what Google is testing with categorized search for products you should visit Retrevo.com. Retrevo launched in September with vertical search for consumer electronics &#8211; if you have to research, buy or fix any gadget Retrevo cuts through the noise and clutter pretty well. &#8211; m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cavan Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112846</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavan Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112846</guid>
		<description>This could be a nice feature as a tab you &quot;turn on&quot; to further sort the organic results, but I can&#039;t imagine Google setting this as the default.  It seems to have plenty of kinks, as I notice Shopping.com is the first listing under &quot;Stores&quot; while Bizrate is listed under &quot;Comparison Shopping&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be a nice feature as a tab you &#8220;turn on&#8221; to further sort the organic results, but I can&#8217;t imagine Google setting this as the default.  It seems to have plenty of kinks, as I notice Shopping.com is the first listing under &#8220;Stores&#8221; while Bizrate is listed under &#8220;Comparison Shopping&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112835</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112835</guid>
		<description>Aw, thank you. My boss just made a very valid point - my concern could be valid depending on what Google makes the default display. And, is &quot;turn off&quot; a one time setting or required with each search? I&#039;d really love more info on this, so I hope others respond soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, thank you. My boss just made a very valid point &#8211; my concern could be valid depending on what Google makes the default display. And, is &#8220;turn off&#8221; a one time setting or required with each search? I&#8217;d really love more info on this, so I hope others respond soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Odden</title>
		<link>http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Odden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/04/google-categories/#comment-112833</guid>
		<description>Ha, I doubt that - you seem pretty much on top of things to me. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I doubt that &#8211; you seem pretty much on top of things to me. <img src='http://www.toprankblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

